Artificial intelligence and generative AI represent the technology adoption whose governance implications the Security Consulting function must address with greater urgency and greater strategic depth than almost any other emerging technology in the current advisory landscape, because the AI adoption’s pace, the breadth of its application across every business function, and the novelty of the security, privacy, and ethical risks it creates together produce the governance challenge whose complexity the organisation’s existing security framework does not accommodate without the specific AI governance architecture that the Security Consulting function must advise on as the immediate priority rather than the emerging technology consideration that the future planning horizon addresses.
The Security Consulting function must position the AI governance advisory at the executive and board level whose strategic oversight the AI adoption’s consequences demand, because the decisions about how the organisation deploys AI, what data it uses to train or inform the AI systems, and what governance framework it establishes for the AI’s decision-making and output quality are fundamentally governance decisions whose risk implications the board’s accountability requires to be understood and whose policy dimensions the executive’s authority requires to be established before the operational deployment whose governance framework the deployment without the executive oversight consistently fails to create.
Understanding the AI Landscape #
The Security Consulting function must advise with the conceptual clarity that distinguishes the different AI capability categories whose security governance requirements differ materially and whose conflation the generic AI advisory without the categorical distinction consistently produces as the governance gap.
Keep reading with a free Eristotle account.
Every document across our Bodies of Knowledge is free to read once you are signed in. No payment, no tier.
